盈彩网app走势图|互动百科

来源：盈彩网app赔率2024-10-12 17:48

盈彩网app走势图

数说江西政协五年“成绩单”：履职尽责凝聚共识******

　　中新网南昌1月10日电 (记者吴鹏泉刘力鑫)收到“委员作业”6000多篇、收集社情民意信息2.9万多条、搭建“赣事好商量”平台6000多个、收到提案3673件立案3194件……五年来，江西政协围绕中心履职尽责，凝聚共识效果增强，为助力江西高质量跨越式发展作出了积极贡献。

　　政协江西省第十三届委员会第一次会议10日在南昌开幕，十二届江西省政协主席姚增科代表政协江西省第十二届委员会常务委员会作工作报告时表示，五年来，江西政协接续发展，履职尽责，干出新时代新样子，彰显新时代新价值。

　　姚增科介绍，江西政协完善履职考核评价体系，按照“一个也不少”要求，建立委员必提交作业、常委必撰写报告、党组成员必进行点评制度，实行“缺会补会、缺学补学、缺训补训”，委员责任意识不断增强。

　　江西政协还探索委员参加计划专题与自主选题调研两结合，形成“委员作业”6000多篇；持续开展委员联系走访民营企业活动，帮助解决“转型升级瓶颈”等难题500多个。

　　姚增科表示，面对战疫战贫抗洪抗旱多场大考，江西政协委员们快速响应，有的不顾个人安危驰援一线，有的及时发声下情上达，有的慷慨解囊捐款捐物，有的深入基层疏导情绪、化解矛盾，关键时刻站得出、顶得上、靠得住，使命担当彰显。

　　十二届江西省政协副主席谢茹在作关于提案工作情况的报告时说，十二届江西省政协全体委员、政协各参加单位和各专门委员会，围绕江西省委、省政府中心工作，聚焦人民群众普遍关心的民生问题履职建言，五年来共收到提案3673件，立案3194件，现已全部办结。

　　谢茹透露，围绕江西经济建设，江西政协提出提案961件。其中，在促进VR、5G、航空电子产业发展等方面，提出提案311件；在做强投融资平台、实施研发攻坚行动、推进“科创飞地”平台建设等方面，提出提案335件；在减税降费、加大惠企纾困力度、促进消费、支持实体经济发展等方面，提出提案315件。

　　谢茹说，围绕社会建设，江西政协提出提案819件。其中，在巩固脱贫攻坚成果、破解“空心村”改造困局、发展新型农村集体经济等方面，提出提案229件；在推进“双减”工作、加快职业教育发展、建设“双一流”高校等方面，提出提案226件；在开发利用江西道地药材、发展中医药和生物医药产业等方面，提出提案364件。

　　姚增科表示，五年来，江西政协共立项课题80个，开展重点协商活动200多场，收到大会发言2800多篇，收集社情民意信息2.9万多条，形成政协专报、建议案160多件，江西省委、省政府领导均就如何鉴用作批示、提要求，成为党政决策重要参考。

　　姚增科说，江西政协广泛开展团结联谊，定期走访慰问少数民族和宗教界委员；组织港澳委员和特邀海外侨胞代表开展返赣视察，参加对接粤港澳大湾区、“赣台会”等经贸活动，引导港澳委员发挥“双重积极作用”。

　　谈到江西政协下一步工作建议时，姚增科表示，要深刻把握新时代新征程人民政协的使命任务，按照中共江西省委部署，坚持党的领导、统一战线、协商民主有机结合，坚持发扬民主和增进团结相互贯通、建言资政和凝聚共识双向发力，推动新时代政协工作高质量发展。(完)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.